Am I the only one who finds it extremely unlikely that Moreia just happened to randomly attach an email to his account that someone related to Bitcointalk happened to own? Assuming it wasn't posted publicly, unless I'm missing something, the only two people who should have had access to the email name are Moreia and redsn0w. Are people really believing that some random third party was the culprit here? Come on.
On one of the many threads about this fiasco it was pointed out that the email was displayed publicly so someone could have hacked the email address that was displayed. It looks like that redsn0w is censoring people criticizing his work in this situation by locking all the threads that are discussing this situation. I would think that most escrows would not do anything with accounts while they are holding them.
Thanks for the opinion , I logged from tor for demonstrate to one of the two admin that I'm logged from that precisely IP. Maybe I could use a vpn , but for a question of rapidity I chose tor.
If you wanted to prove that you controlled the other account with IP evidence then you would log into the account with the same IP address.As I told before , that is the first time that I didn't change also the email , only because I've seen the random letters and I don't remember if it was public or not.
Is the fact that an email address is public or not tracked (@badbear), if it can be verified that it was public (or if this is not tracked) then it is plausible some third party was behind this, if it can be verified that it was not public then the culprit was defiantly either moreia or you and you logged into the account the exact same way the person who was trolling logged inI'm think I'm sufficient competent, because I'm learning from my mistake/forgetfulness; but someone make me really trouble. Thanks again to the community.
If you are still learning then you are not competent (by definition). As mentioned above it is concerning that you are posting from an account you are controlling via escrow and effectively censoring criticism of your work