I have read the thread in question. You were buying trust. You originally required that trust be left for you and the lack of trust being left would result in you not repaying the loan (you later dropped this requirement after you were given negative trust). You had posted that you were considering to buy LTC with your BTC to use as collateral. You claimed that you wanted to buy more LTCgear shares however your scheme resulted in you having less funds available to pay for them and as a result your request (and reason) was illogical.
No, I removed the condition while in discussion over my first loan request with John. K, Quickseller, Vod and others. ref:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=895901.msg9861654#msg9861654I then left Vod negative trust to which he replied in
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=895901.msg9861818#msg9861818 "That is not the basis on which I left the feedback. It's because the only reason you are taking out the loans is to get positive feedback from others - i.e. buying trust."
His statement is
not that I required people to leave me positive feedback. It should be clear from the timeline
I did not require people to leave me positive feedback.Vod's accusation that I was trust buying is that
I did not need the loan because I had liquid collateral.This was a misunderstanding by vod as shown here; ref:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=906763.msg9968031#msg9968031Furthermore it was very clearly advertised that I wanted a loan to invest in hashie.co and other cloud mining. If vod was unsure of my reasoning before, then he certainly must be aware of it now since I have taken out a loan and repaid it despite this fiasco. What is Vod's problem?