So news sites should not cover a companies release of a product because some people do not like them?
I will also say that the title is GAW Claims not me claiming it.
I have no once said it is not a big deal peoples email addresses and balances were seen. It was and is a bad thing.
I have never put anyone on ignore until now.
I report about a breach and ask the company involved what happened as no other site bothered.
Fine if they want to spew hate that is fine. I'm done responding to it and reading it. I never personally attacked anyone or made fun of their situation. I don't wish on anyone what I deal with each day not even him. But I am done responding.
There is no need for that. That is why people who are on the outside think Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies are not serious and the playground of people they don't want to deal with. Too many people cannot debate or disagree without resorting to something like that. It is not just about GAW stuff either there is just so much hate between different groups and philosophies in here instead of discussion and learning.
"No private data lost" is a blatant lie. Data that was previously not public, was made public. That is the very definition of losing private data.
You claim to publish the good and the bad but in reality you never publish the bad, you censor any slightly negative comments, and publish nothing but GAW press releases/advertisements.
"it was not a massive data leak or a breach"
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/paybase-security-issue-cloudflare-glitch-showing-static-data-customer-sessions-no-data-lost/Those are your words, not GAW's. Either way they are completely false. If GAW said that, you should have commented that it's not true, but that doesn't matter because YOU are saying it, and now you know it's false.
If you are legitimate you will change those words, if you are not you will not, it's very simple.
I went back and re-read the article and it is nowhere near the level on the level of a news report as more of a softball session with a GAW PR rep.
Injecting his own commentary at the end colors the overall purpose of the article as a friendly PR blast that "GAW said it was okay, so there is nothing to see here".