I would say a negative trust is much more appropiate. His lack of a willingness to accept personal responsibility in this situation shows that he is not willing to cover any mistakes that he makes. He implied that he was not going to reimburse the lender for his loan (Moreia would almost certainly not repay his loan if his collateral is gone). P
I dunno. Negative seems too harsh so neutral would be more appropriate, but BadBear removed his feedback and Redsnow did the right thing by ceasing his escrow services anyway.
this demonstrates that if he gives an address to send payment to that he doesn't control he will treat it as if payment was not received. If I am sending first to him and he makes this kind of mistake then I am out however much I just sent.
This is essentially what happened with segvec in the currency exchange section when he gave someone an incorrect address and the person who sent funds to be out 14 btc
Edit:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896143.0