Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [TTY] Trinity | SHA + Scrypt + Groestl
by
bonifacy
on 02/01/2015, 21:42:10 UTC
1) Increasing total number of blocks - No!
2) PoS - No!
If I may ask, what did you mean by "No!" --- did you mean it as in, don't do it? or did you mean it as, you don't see it in effect right now?
Cause if you don't see it implemented right now, that's because we haven't coded it yet, the increase of number of blocks Or the PoS.
We should be able to get the Proof of Stake implemented within the next 2 months, hopefully less though Smiley

1) Increasing total number of blocks - No!
Left more than 1,000,000 of blocks. It's more than 22 months of minning (one block per 1 minute). In my opinion the number of block is sufficient. I don't see reason to increase it. Better concentrate why blocks are mining too fast (please see my previous post).

2) PoS - No!
There are many crypto currencies with PoS implementation. But what for? To keep coins on wallet and wait for interest which are extremely low? I think that keeping coins isn't good for coins. I think that trading is more valuable for coins. I don't see any advantages of PoS. So no. PoS is bad idea. Please do not implement PoS.

It's my opinion. You will do what you want :-)