Quote from: NSCrypto on January 02, 2015, 11:53:18 PM

Quote from: AnimoEsto on January 02, 2015, 11:47:01 PM

Quote from: NSCrypto on January 02, 2015, 11:44:55 PM

Quote from: AnimoEsto on January 02, 2015, 11:42:38 PM

Folks I don't agree with Josh's kids being identified - that's a little bit ott

are you maursader?

Ummm no my name on HT is the same as here

meh, you just sound exactly like him.

ps. just b/c you have an account on hashtalk with the same name doesn't do anything to prove you aren't who I thought you to be Wink

Just because you didn't spend two minutes looking into who maursader is and who AnimoEsto is doesn't do anything to prove what you just made up

Come on, there is enough real crap to pick apart, no need to invent anything...

Quote from: cazalla on January 02, 2015, 11:54:50 PM

Quote from: mm5aes on January 02, 2015, 11:46:37 PM

Bitpop, not the kids man?

Fuck that! What about the families of the victims? Garza is solely responsible for putting his wife and kids in the firing line when he decided to run scams. An example must be made to send a strong signal that scamming will not be tolerated and the consequences will be most severe. To date, this is yet to be done and is one reason as to why these schemes continue.

Tough interwebs guy, huh? A bit of a logic gap here, if Garza is responsible, why are the "consequences" directed at 5-year olds? Should they go to jail with him too if it comes to that? Get a grip noob.