Ok brothers I've read the sidechains whitepaper and I have a question.
What are the regulatory/political drawbacks or ramifications of introducing extra-anonymous features in a scBTC?
Nobody cares about the fucking goverment. This is Crypto.
Adam,
5. if a SC like Zerocoin/Zerocash gets declared illegal by the US gvt, legit pools that can't/won't participate in an illegal SC might have an actual incentive to attack it to destroy those users and their scBTC that are in fact using Zerocoin/Zerocash illegally. given that no SC will ever have 100% MM, 51% attacks become much easier to execute.
- you are using tooo much "if"s
- you see MM as only solutions (we will have only few 2-3 100% MM SC
(edit: if any :-))) => there are other better solutions than MM
what are they besides federated servers?
- yes, it is possible to use private federated server (FS) for local SC
- it is possible to create independent oracles
- it is possible to use timestamps in MC (MCTS)
- it is possible to use various combination of FS, MCTS and oracles
solution than MM. it's inferior.