I rarely reply to garbage like this but I'd like to say this...
I expect that when my operation finally ends and not a single coin is lost, you own up to your outlandish claims and apologize to my lenders.
See you then.
I expect that when my operation finally ends and not a single coin is lost, you own up to your outlandish claims and apologize to my lenders.
See you then.
Sure.
And, of course, to you personally for my outrageous behavior. After all, I am insulting the nice person who gives anyone free money.But for now, this is not the situation. Care to actually break the method of the artificially distant Ponzi operator and engage in a brief discussion? After all, I have absolutely no reason to act like this if it is all a big misunderstanding.
Let's keep it simple for starters. We could really use a hint as to why returns are so strongly dependent on the size of individual deposits, if not for the reason documented in the Currin Trading Ponzi (http://web.archive.org/web/20091026234156/http://geocities.com/currintrading/ On a side note, the text also documented neatly why an operator rarely replies to garbage like this).
If time allows, I have one more enigma here: it is quite remarkable how relative fluctuations of deposits degraded over time, isn't it? Or has anyone heard of major series of forced withdrawals lately?
I think these should be valid questions, not just garbage. And, quite frankly, it's not like I am the only person who suspects a Ponzi here. If there is a satisfactory answer, it should help the overall reputation of BS&T quite a bit, independent of whether the question is garbage.
Do you have any coins at stake, or are you simply preaching fire and brimstone?
I am here not only for profit, but out of passion for Bitcoin and its free market. I do not like how "free" at times becomes a synonym for "anarchic". We will all suffer the damage of that, and it outright endangers the project to have all these major shake-ups while the Bitcoin markets are still young and relatively fragile.