....
If it's justifiable and there is genuine concern, but if it isn't the feedback will very likely get brought up here and the reasoning questioned much like this thread now. If people abuse the feedback system over personal issues it usually comes back to bite them.
In this case his negative feedback is not right , as moreia told (he was involved in "first row").
It's not obvious and it's still a concern that you are still considering the escrow once this all blows over. Just because you won't do accounts anymore isn't the problem. What happens if you screw up on something else and make an even costlier mistake? The issue here was your error not that accounts are insecure (they're pretty secure once handled right).
I'm waiting the funds , if tomorrow will not arrive I will post in the signature campaign topic that the funds will not cover all the 100 posts during the week.
...
Yes I believe my feedback is right. You have asked me many times, and I was threatened with negative feedback to remove it. Trust me if there was a doubt that it was right I would have removed it a long time ago and admitted my mistake.
My trust rating for you is not going to stop anyone from trading with you. At the very most it would cause someone to want to use escrow while trading with you, however even the most reputable people are willing to accept escrow
edit: I personally think the people who have left neutral feedback is incorrect
I think the negative feedback was right if I went away from the run or "bad" I've lost forever the moreia's account , but this is not the case. I'm still here , and the account was recovered.
]I didn't ask him to put a negative feedback to you , it was his decision.