What about child pornography gangs? I don't think there are any, but honestly, I've never seen an actual drug gang either. -Or pimps for adults. Pimps are usually violent in movies -- well, not porn movies, cause porn studios have a reputation to uphold, obviously. ....
If children were sexually abused in the privacy of their home rather than beaten on the street AND sexually abused, should we applaud bitcoin's triumphant entry into the market and post comments on news sites about how bad child rape was before bitcoin came on the scene?
-Or the assassin market. How many people wanted to hire assassins but were assassinated upon payment before crypto-escrow? I bet more than one.
Your example about children are raped on the streets is just ridiculous. Cp is not produced on the open street. If it is send via your post office or via the internet or traded on the street is also pretty much irrelevant for the children.
I am of the opinion that active pedos are rapists pure and simple. However, when the only outlet at all is child rape, then society is failing those encumbered with this "mental" problem and their victims. Law enforcement lost moral authority in my view, when they started going after simulated CP, art, adult girlfriends dressed as schoolgirls, that sort of thing. Also believe that non-active pedos, should be able to communicate together, as group therapy if nothing else. IMO, to insist that all pedo thinking persons intend to harm children is the same as thinking that everyone with heterosexual normative (or Homo) thoughts, fantasies, and those who seek material related to that are rapists. Therefore, if bitcoin enabled access to materials that involved no children in production, then that IMO would be a societal win. The alternative IMO is sealing up the valve on the "pressure cooker" of pedo thinking individuals and expecting them not to explode.
However, who wants to have to moderate/gatekeeper that shit?