What I do not understand, is if you have to scream SCAM from the mountaintops, why isn't that cry backed up by real evidence of wrongdoing, and not just presumed wrongdoing?
I never screamed scam, but I'm just failing to understand how repeated lies and poorly implemented or forgotten promises and other ongoing issues can't be considered wrong by some who have a lower threshold of tolerance for that kind of stuff? If it's not a scam but just a poorly managed business, is it really inconceivable that some people might have their trust in the "intent" affected by that?
No it is not and I agree with you. But a lot of others have screamed scam.