Re: GAW Zen Hashlet PayCoin unofficial uncensored discussion. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :-)

And... that's how we prove they're using pre-mined coins to fulfill their PayBase orders...

The blockchain never lies.

So basically you're saying those coins never visited any exchange? Could it be possible that one of those 740 or 370 addresses was an exchange deposit address? I know it's unlikely because it looks to be a fairly neat halving pattern, so it would be an extremely odd coincidence that e.g. a Hashpoint customer moved 740 coins to an exchange then GAW purchased 370 coins and the exchange just happened to send them out from the same deposit wallet. Am I thinking about this right?

The split to almost equal parts to the same address are staking transactions.

Yes, they were staking with their pre-mined coins while they were/are dispersing them. At least it was only 5%... they didn't use a prime350 code at that time... I guess I should of said thankfully, but I'm not going to.

EDIT: But it doesn't change the outcome of the excavation. The tx ID supplied for the purchase of coins via PayBase credit card came from pre-mine.

Ok, I'm going to pretend now that I understand this. Looks like a smoking gun as those coins never left GAW's possession.

Based on what I see and how I understand it: Yes. These coins that were purchased through PayBase with a credit card did not come from an exchange but instead came from the pre-mined coins that were still in GAW's possession.

I'll let someone else disprove me if they'd like. Unlike "gawd", I'm not infallible.

EDIT:

This is EXACTLY what the SEC and other financial authorities would like to hear...:

"...We will move the market ourselves ..." ... Wink

VERY NICE shot in the leg, Retard ...I mean Homero... Grin

Clear case of Documented Market Manipulation...

ZiG