Please don't fight guys...
I didn't post the picks as it was specifically stated in the email not too - I can easily do so.
You can post the picks, Ryan posted them in a sample Jan 5 message screenshot. Here is my analysis:
Let's assume you don't care about the second places, and go all in on the big four, 25 BTC each in XC, START, BYC, 2015.
Prices on Jan 05:
XC: 20k
START: 5.2k
BYC: 51k
2015: 360
Prices now + best prices until now:
XC: 28.5k
START: 8k
BYC: 38k
2015: 700
Results:
XC: +42%
START: +54%
BYC: -25%
2015: +94%
Average: +41%
Not bad. But what does Ryan say was his result, even when these are extremely amazingly well timed ideal results and not average results? This:
http://s14.postimg.org/cln0aor0x/list2.pngXC: +55% (not even possible)
START: ?!
BYC: +64% (profits where there should be losses?)
2015: +163% (idonteven.jpg)