So, I am busy right now. I scanned Nick's post. I'm glad he is writing again and the material seems pretty clearly written and on point, but which part exactly made your draw drop?
Would you care to elaborate on the connections you posted?
It is kind of hard to agree or disagree with a bunch of links.
Would you care to elaborate on the connections you posted?
It is kind of hard to agree or disagree with a bunch of links.
Sure;
Nick posted again today, (praising ethereum once again;) and I was reading and I noticed his use of the term "block chain" instead of "blockchain"
http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
Most people refer to it as blockchain (one word) as showen here by the Google trends.
http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=blockchain%2C%20block%20chain&cmpt=q
and then I naturally looked up
http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/
Satoshi never said blockchain. He calls the ledger block chain.
It's fun but he could just imitate Satoshi and he is not the only one to use block chain. We would need more than one of these to start thinking he is satoshi.