This is in my view highly dangerous to society and in no sense or fashion "good." In the world of Bitcoin yes, we do need to discuss the divergence or lack of between the "use of money" and the "nature of money" because some may think they can interject "moral, legal, regulatory" into the nature of bitcoin algorithmically.
I think this is a guaranteed outcome. At no point in history have individual subjects had true control over the coffers of the kingdom. Morality attacks will be used against Bitcoin to engage legal and regulatory controls in an attempt to neuter its use to circumvent government power. Mountains of dollars are used to prove governments moral superiority and maintain control over citizens. Infinite piles of dollars will be spent ensuring government control of Bitcoin. They simply cannot allow Bitcoin to replace fiats use in any small capacity