Instead of trashing the Washington Post, does anyone have any intelligent critique of the author's points/ideas?
For one thing, obvious trash doesn't deserve a "critique" really. Second, I'm sure a lot of people are completely bored refuting hackneyed lies like "Bitcoin is a ponzi" after so many years of it. There's a thread on here about scientific proof for God, and most of us aren't posting our intelligent critiques there either. You can look up what a Ponzi scheme is, then see why the article isn't worth reading even.
Your hair is cool. The word "Ponzi" is trumpeted frequently but has never applied. Only idiots and morons that fail to understand the details and distinctions (and the definition of the word they use) keep shouting it. Or government/banker shills.