Ponzi Games are getting interesting, but as well as it is getting risky. Operators are keeping things hazy to the investors. As a coder I am preparing to launch a provably fair ponzi game. Would like to know what are the points people are suggesting to cover so that we can minimize the risk as well as make it provably fair and interesting.
Ideas are welcome. Please make this discussion constructive...
Ponzi schemes by definition end up in the moment the author of the scheme decides to run away with the money that was collected. What would you like to have provably fair? The probability that the scammer runs away after, say two days? Please clarify what you really mean.
Minimizing the risks? Well, I bet none of the Ponzi authors would agree for an honest and renowned escrow (with positive trust) for some fixed amount of time.