Vitalik is going with PoW for ethereum despite all his research into TaPoS and weak subjectivity. Why?
Source? As I understand it, he is still deciding between a PoS/PoW combo and full PoS.
- we have formally defined nothing-at-stake attack(again, using Buterin's informal definition) and made initial simulations. We haven't included their results in paper as they are seems to be too raw, but I can reveal them here: N@S attack could happens only in short-range, e.g. for within 20 blocks for 10% stake, so with 30 confirmations we haven't observed the successful attack. Also please note the attack has pretty unpredictable nature for attacker, so he can hardly enforce it, even in theory(in practice it's even harder to get it done properly). The correlation with stake size is still the open question, but it's nearly impossible to attack a proof-of-stake currency with "1% stake even" as stated by Buterin
So just extend the number of confirmations to 30, then short range attack becomes impossible. (6 confirmations on bitcoin is an hour, so a shorter block PoS coin would still take less time than bitcoin confirmation)