I see no similarity of this chips apart of process. Cointerra specified its chip power efficiency as 0.5 W/GH/s, while MBP described its mining gear as having similar efficiency but at the wall.
The difference is obvious.

I observed the 100TH/500TH thing from the IPO. The 100TH development depended heavily (or more: all or nothing) on creation of Bitfury chips.
I followed all the information concerning first Bitfury chips (mainly on Russian language threads) in 2013. In short: they were a bit late and produced half the expected speed, but comparing to the rest of the industry it was sheer luck to achieve so much. (In 2014 Bitfury had no such luck with his next generations of chips, despite spending plenty of money.)
I followed the threads discussing the development of devices based on the chips. In short: there were problems with the stability (first devices needed much baby-sitting) and reliability, which were resolved only after several months. In effect there was shortage of devices and, indirectly, problems for 100TH.
Basing on all that, I can say that in my opinion, Giray, your accusations are empty. If you invested when the share price was high, don't blame others for your bad investment decision.