So for those people who aren't interested in reading a whole discussion which includes a few supposed 'names' and plenty of 'no names', what's the point you're trying to make?
Just be clear, don't link or quote the world, there's people here who're trying to make there own mind up on the issue raised in the title of this thread. You're pretty articulate when you want to be Jim, don't make the world zone out and miss the import of your meaning by linking to crappolla, just say what you want to say directly, we'll understand.
See here:
https://hashtalk.org/users/sort-reputationThe point is that almost all of GAW's most vocal supporters are now detractors.
Just by way of observation, this quotation from your supposed 'trust' rating:
"Slark 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-12-05 0.00000000 Reference This user is a serial shill. Caught using 4 accounts to promote GAW while taking advantage of their signature campaign.
Known shill accounts:
Slark
Hazir
maku
Snorek"
You know damn well I wouldn't trust you as far as I could throw you, you shilled for months on how good Black Arrow were and there's now about 400 pages of discrediting information on BA on this forum, even the Bitcointalk forum owner Theymos resurrected deleted information on BA due to their unconscionable scamming practices:
I wasn't a shill, I was just an idiot which I'm willing to admit. Everyone has their "the fudsters were right" moment.
This guy on the other hand made 4 accounts to promote GAW. The proof is in the blockchain.