Can't tell about the others, but I'm really not trying too hard since the bet. It did cost some time and nerves to keep it up.
It seems difficult to figure out your stance right now, so curiosity has me poke here and there. What I wonder about: why respond to the discussion of fund inflow, and post numbers? Are there by any chance investors who know it's a Ponzi and need to be reassured that they aren't late? Or are you showing off numbers to me so I see the bet was a success? That number should look quite dangerous to the legitimate scenario. It shows the user growth easily suffices for a Ponzi operation, even though we should have just had a "bad" phase.
Point -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lYBVi3ALWA Point - The question was not asked by you nor was the answer intended to wind your clock. I've never had a problem answering questions that are direct and non intrusive. An inquiring mind asked and I responded.
Point - Yes yes, everything I write is for you and has an alternate meaning.