1. The defendant made a false representation of a past or present material fact;
2. The fact was material;
3. At the time the representation was made, the defendant:
_(a) knew the representation was false; or,
_(b) was aware that he/she did not know whether the representation was true or false
4. The defendant made the representation w/ the intent that the plaintiff would rely on the representation
5. The plaintiff did rely on the representation;
6. The plaintiff's reliance was justified; and
7. This reliance caused injuries or damages tot he plaintiff.
Looks like a slam dunk when you put it that way.
Always profitable
Depreciating costs
Will buy at $20
Merchant adoption at launch
Debit cards within the next two weeks
Probably a few others.
But that's from a forum post perspective of course. Proving some of that crap in a court of law is quite another story, especially after the intense cleansing and TOS manipulation.