Re: CloudMining.website is offering 1 GHs @ 0.001 BTC

Quote from: Mabsark on January 20, 2015, 05:15:00 PM

Quote from: kotwica666 on January 20, 2015, 05:09:00 PM

Where is transaction fee then?

Erm...what relevance is that supposed to have? The transaction fee for everyone of those 3 transactions was 0.0001 BTC though, whatever difference that makes to you.

13RJvPMzxdAyzXQNnLAAimrMQBGseRJRmC (dr1980m's address) > 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (Cloud Mining Website pay-in address).

1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (Cloud Mining Website pay-in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.

1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM > 1MPxhNkSzeTNTHSZAibMaS8HS1esmUL1ne (Eobot).

I challenged you in a bet regarding your two lies that you posted first...

Looks like you have already got spooked and got back from your first claim. So, should I assume that you have accepted that you were lying about the first point ?

Quote from: RussianRaibow on January 18, 2015, 04:56:02 PM

-snip-

I want to bet with you that...

1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.

2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.

How much you want to bet ?

Regarding the second point, we dont need cloud mining in the whole bet scenario at all. We have all the evidences in blockchain and I have already stated the statement I'm betting on. You dont need to take any pain to prove anything... I have understood your limitations. I'll prove the statement by blockchain analysis. How about it now ? Accept or still whine to confuse people ?

Accept it or stop lying.