. . .
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/RiemannZetaFunction/NumberedEquation3.gifThe problem here is that conventional mathematics uses a flawed (i.e., partially anti-symmetric [i.e., one divided by infinity is equal to zero and one divided by zero is undefined]) numerical system. The Riemann hypothesis should be provable when using
Earths numerical system with
the systems zero approached from the positive direction (which is of greater magnitude than its positive infinity) in the place of the traditional infinity of the conventional Riemann zeta function.
ℝ = {0⁻, −∞,
, −1,
, −⅟∞, −0⁻, −0⁺, ⅟∞,
, 1,
, ∞, 0⁺}
That's very insightful. Thanks!
So, if applied to my frequency spectrum example, the 0-frequency flat-line of non-existence at the bottom, which all non-zero frequencies can sample and thus refer to (as we do now), is actually a whole another reality-bubble of existence within itself
(with its own 0 and infinity), which cascades this way further and further indefinitely. Thus the idea of becoming non-existent can only be experienced momentarily, as this state immediately brings forward the realization that you're suddenly everything there is, which then cools down towards a particular finite shape, so that the whole process can repeat itself again and again.
. . .
s numerical system (username18333) loops around at both its −0 (under conventional mathematics, zero) and its 0 (under conventional mathematics, undefined).