Re: Moderator purposefully uses 'no more posting/pm due to 'trolling' to obstruct
Maybe you forgot that it's my thread - and I was countering all of you who were trying to hide behind 'logic' when clearly you were contributing nothing to the thread 
The fact that you started the thread does not mean you can post whatever you want there. You must still follow the forum's rules when posting in threads you yourself started. Is anyone supposed to tolerate outright lies and slander without having a say? You go cry to mods when it's an argument you started to begin with, and I merely responded 
We can agree to disagree that what people were posting were lies and slander however your responses were trolling. It is more or less never appropriate to resort to namecalling or personal attacks when responding to someone who is criticizing you. You were also almost never responding to the specific "lies" that were presented, but rather quoted the previous post and resorted to further personal attacks. '-snip-' haha cutting out all the relevant parts and quoting them. Exactly what I would expect from people like you. As it should be obvious to anyone, you are just dragging it out and hoping to get the last word in. This is an argument nothing more, and I certainly did not intrude in your thread or sent you harassing PM's, and never intruded in anyone else' s business.
No I am not trying to get the last word in, nor am I cutting out the "relevant" parts of the post, if anyone wishes to dispute this fact is free to click on each of the quotes and will be lead directly to the full posts in question. Like I said above, the person who started a specific thread does not matter. Your conduct in following the thread to here just to slander someone from an argument YOU started with smears, is clearly a sign you believe you are entitled to dish it out without being called on it.
I disagree but you are entitled to your opinion.Took all that time to diligently distort my words with your 'quotes' by cutting out all the relevant parts of me countering your lies, and yet you believe you did yourself a favor posting this. Thank you for demonstrating exactly why this moderator action was unwarranted, and demonstrating how my opposing party is simple trying to make a low move in getting back after I successfully concluded reservations with real people interested in dealing professionally
You are free to counter my points by cutting out what you feel does not matter and include what you feel is "relevant". Moderators do not actually ban people, it is only administrators that have the authority to ban people. Additionally there are not any moderators currently assigned to the lending section so only administrators (or global moderators) can delete/edit posts in that section). The fact that a moderator believed this to be a 'trolling' when I was only defending my offer in my own thread is clearly an overreach at best, an outright misstep more likely by a staff with a personal interest in hindering my forum activities when they allow so many other threads and trolls to go unscrutinized. ESPECIALLY considering how it just happens to be done when I am conducting my business with others and they obstruct my ability to communicate with my clients.
The evidence shows otherwise. You were banned at a time when you were attempting to conduct business in an unprofessional manner. Although the form does not officially moderate scams, you were also conducting business in a scammy manor.Take your entitled mentality elsewhere. I never intruded on anyone else's business and didn't even report you or others in that thread for 'trolling' no matter how much you deserve it. You on the other hand....
If you feel that I have ever trolled in my posting history feel free to present evidence of such. I think that most people would say it is fair that I have not. For the record I did not report any of your posts. Even if I did report your posts another third party (a global moderator or an administrator) would have had to have taken action against your posts or an administrator would have had to have banned you. [quote author=TJogger link=topic=931143.msg10222360#msg10222360 date=1421797214
This must be address properly with due prudence. Anyone can see that this is merely an act of spite, nothing more considering what the forum is flooded with (outright scammers, smears, shills, frauds, real trolls, etc etc). I don't recall barging into another thread and asking for 'proof' when I am uninvolved or otherwise was not part of the business being conducted.
[/quote]
Do not try to hide behind 'forum rules' when clearly your intention is to insult, harass and other wise obstruct another's business with obviously transparent accusations. You are not being especially subtle trying to stick to 'forum rules' when it suits you
I have answered your obvious intent with a straight forward and direct answers. Furthermore, you made your intentions even more clear by following me here and attempting to frame my previous quotes while removing passages that clearly demonstrate your sniveling lies about 'legitimate criticisms'.
This is a base and low argument that you knowingly intiated, and anyone can see this. Of course you would further try to frame it as 'breaking forum rules' while you hang on to my ankles like some desperate woman
Your little charade is really unbecoming. I would advise you mind your own business from this point on, and I am sure a moderator who conducted himself in a spiteful manner and hiding behind their 'moderator privileges' will know his action is now exposed for all to see. This is, once again, not the first time such unwarranted moderator action has been taken during critical times
Trying to act from behind every excuse you can scrape together is a bitch move, nothing more. Your semantics are really childish. Please have the backbone to speak straight if you don't like my business, instead of desperately trying to find slivers of excuses to bother someone.