The OP doesn't have a point, he's lashing out in what be believes is a similar manner to what I did right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=930649.0The OP is being a vindictive child and is to be treated (and rated) as such. This is to serve as a warning to others, as well as a reminder of his own inadequacy.
I would not say that being a "child" is a reason to label them as a scammer. He has his right to make any claims that he wishes. If his claims are invalid then they will be ignored.
I do think he does have a point as paul revere's claims played no small part in the bashing of woodcollector.
OP's rating of me:
"Expects us to believe that Woodcolleter is a fraud after WC paid me $1,000 usd worth of bitcoin to protect his clients because he is such an honorable business person."
Yes, I expect people to believe WC is a fraud, EVEN THOUGH he paid you a thousand dollars to delete a post on this forum.
You realize that thousand dollars you accepted was taken under false pretenses from one of his victims, yes?
If the OP gave you a "bad" rating then no one will take it seriously. The OP is not on the default trust list so his claim is not going to affect you. Your claim/rating is going to be visible to everyone who looks at his profile by default. What you are doing by leaving him negative trust is to silence your critics