If a person really needs to conceal that sort of activity, then they will make the effort to make sure each tx goes to a new address. Period. End of story.
No stirring intended.
As for a person who needs to conceal that type of activity, I would argue that for commercial reasons this applies to most merchants (i.e. where a lot of transaction volume will come from in future years).
Anyway it was genuine. I hold some DRK. I will leave now to prevent anyone else accuses me of having false intentions.
G.
From a commercial, legal standpoint, it's fine having all the coins end up in the same initial address as proof of payment. There is nothing illegal about that. DS protects the senders identity. The real question is why you have to conceal receiving funds if you are operating a legal business. If it's a means of protecting different clients, DS already serves that purpose.