Fist of all, I've told you repeatedly to shove your unwinnable bet up your arse.

Second, I never said that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 could be proven to be the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec by blockchain analysis. I simply claimed it was the owner because that's what the evidence strongly suggests. With 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec being CMW's incoming payment collection address, it stands to reason that payments to it will be from CMW owned addresses which I've shown to be true for numerous other addresses. If the input addresses belong to CMW and one of the two output addresses belongs to CMW, given all the other evidence provided and the very distinct repeating pattern of the transactions, it's bloody obvious that 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 is also owned by CMW.

Thirdly, I've already shown that 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec was involved in the transaction between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L and 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM, as well as a shit load of other transactions involving CMW addresses and that Eobot address.

Fourthly, what lies have I told? Point to a specific one.

Lastly, who gives a shit about those 2 chains though when I just provided 9 chains with that very same distinct flow of funds. Basically, you'd have to be a SimplemindedSpanishSoldier, a RetardedRussianRainbow or a GullibleGermanGiant to ignore such evidence.