-snip-
I want to bet with you that...
1. 1KufA3z7mLntENepGKo9Ktu9S7qAL2oLF3 can not be proven as owned by the owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec in any way by blockchain analysis.
2. Owner of 1LfpedDQLqqEmSDZ9B7v2sPzz5NeeDhXec has no hand in the transaction link between 1F91HzJaQZ1WGU9NG2ZhFaXctZD6vMsV3L (pay in address) > 1GNmnxWkComFYF7k8EBeKtgQz2sprUGYvM.
How much you want to bet ?
So Muppet, you are accepting that you were lying all through and can not accept the bet above ?

Im not in the least interested in the above bet, because I never made the claim, never looked in to it, and most importantly, its impossible to prove a negative in an unbound system, so its a ridiculous bet. Might as well ask to prove there is no teapot orbiting the sun. No, I cant prove its not there, so if you want to believe its there, be my guest.
So now just answer my question: will you accept a bet they will or wont run off with the money over the next 6 month?
It is actually the other way. I am interested to prove that it does not get proved from the given transaction that fund has moved from cloud mining address to Eobot. Why is you/your alt/your friend spooked to accept that ? If it can not be proven, then what is point of screaming everywhere that you have a proof that it is sending fund to Eobot ? Either u have the proof or u dont. Which one is true ?
Your bet is like, asking to bet in December whether CEX.io will cease cloud mining operation or not. Though there is nothing wrong in it, how am I supposed to know a certain company's management decision ? I am not interested in gambling here. I am interested in betting on something that is clear from the blockchain.