Your analysis is not only wrong but straight up defamation.
Why would I maliciously misrepresent your words or actions? I have nothing to gain by this. I linked to references that are either legal documents or written by members of Bitcoinica LP.
Bitcoin Consultancy LTD is a UK Limited company which is neither owned nor owns any other company.
I did not claim this. I claim the members behind both companies are the same. Based on Tihans quote: "The members of Bitcoin Consultancy operated Bitcoinica via a separate New Zealand Ltd company formed for this purpose."
Intersango LTD is a UK Limited company which is neither owned nor owns any other company.
I did not mention Intersango LTD at all.
Bitcoinica LP is a New Zealand Limited Partnership.
I agree, and did not claim otherwise
Core Credit LTD is a New Zealand Limited Company and the General Partner of Bitcoinica LP.
Ah this is new info. On 2012/06/07 Amir claimed that Core Credit Limited is Tihan's Parent company (the Limited Partner). See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=84042.msg946751#msg946751 Core Credit LTD was renamed to Bitcoinica Consultancy LTD significantly after the events occurred.
Yes it happened on 2012/05/30 and it was never explained why this happened despite me asking repeatedly. Nevertheless the legal incorporation date for Bitcoinica Consultancy is 2012/01/30 according to the NZ documentation.
I personally have absolute no legal obligation to assist in any of this. 100% of my time and effort is donation.
I didn't say you were individually liable. As far as I understand the General Partner is liable. The General Partner is Bitcoinica Consultancy Ltd. You are a member of Bitcoinica Consultancy Ltd. (Unless this changed on May 30) Please correct me if I am wrong.
As for Zhou's "plan" that is precisely what he said he intended to do, a strategy I find to be immensely immoral.
It seems it is you doing the defamation here.
Oh and Patrick - Respect is earned. In the same way I earned the 30.000+ USD worth of funds that you are holding against my consent for the last 2 months.
I realize I am probably putting my claim at risk by pissing off 'the only person' who can help me get 'most' of my funds back but so be it.
As for Zhou's "plan" that is precisely what he said he intended to do, a strategy I find to be immensely immoral.
From the sounds of it Zhou was the only one that had any actual day to day ops knowledge of the system. This was probably the best plan given that right now you are basically trying to put together a puzzle with a million pieces and you don't even have the box to refer too for what the fucking thing is supposed to look like.
17 year old asian kids remember everything.
His plan was to pay the most vocal people 100% of their claimed amount.
Those funds would come directly out of other users pockets.
There are x assets and y liabilities.
x < y
If people are paid 100% of their claims, necessarily those funds are coming out of other users pockets.
Not only is this strategy immoral, but it is arguably illegal.
Of course the intention there is to save face and to give back funds to people most likely to litigate.
I will have no part in anything I believe to be immoral.