Considering your own property rights and those of others, which is more important to end, or perhaps you draw no such distinction, or else they are too evenly matched to choose one over the other?

Would you say that you own your own body?

Do you see any danger of abandoning something precious when it is embedded or intertwined with something onerous?

If it were widely regarded as unacceptable to cause suffering for the purpose of protecting property rights, would you then see value in the tradition?

What is the significance to the tradition of property rights of the distinction Eisenstein draws between money and all other goods?