Re: ⋆⋆⋆ [SDC] ShadowCash | ShadowSend v2 IS ALIVE ! ** MANDATORY WALLET UPGRADE! ⋆⋆⋆

I have question about slide #6, from transcript:

Quote

The Shadow tokens (SDT) are sent to dual-key stealth addresses which removes the link between the parties. it is not possible to determine which tokens have been spent, so all tokens remain in the Hodrchain as spendable outputs available as members 0! ring signatures for other token spends.

Also slide 10:

Quote

An ever increasing pool of outputs (tokens) are available in the ring signature The tokens remain in the system increasing the outputs for available ring signatures but cannot be used to create any new SDC without a traceable ring. Between 3-200 tokens of each value (ormsa member of a ring signature, which prevents anyone from knowing which token was spent or who signed the transaction.

Doesn't this mean that it would be helpful for the network if we transfer from SDC to Shadow and back to SDC many times? The more times we go back and forth, then the more available outputs, which helps the anonymity of the network? I believe many people tried to help the network by transferring their SDC to Shadow and leaving it in Shadow, but would it be more helpful if they transfer back and forth many times? Also would a bot be helpful for increasing the anonymous outputs?

From my understanding of the system it would be more beneficial to create more outputs then put it back into SDC versus holding Shadow.

A) Shadow doesn't stake so the more people holding onto shadow the less people that are staking

B) It creates a larger pool of tokens for future shadowsends

Thank you, that clarifies it then. People should then know that if they want to help the network the most, don't just leave your coins in Shadow. Keep changing into Shadow and back to SDC and back to Shadow many times to create more anonymous outputs.

Hey child_harold, did you see this part of the thread? Coolstoryteller, along with the slide presentation on the new website seem to suggest that leaving your coins in Shadow may not be the total best thing for the network, although its still helpful. Actually it seems if you change from SDC to Shadow and then back to SDC, those anonymous outputs remain forever. So it seems the most help we can do for the network is transfer back and forth between Shadow and SDC many times. Every time we do it, it makes more anonymous outputs that remain forever.

Also good on the tweet. I will light Craptsy up in the trollbox later too, starting Monday when I know user Mullick will be in there.