Quote
So when this masterpiece comes up on auction, the winning bidder should probably be informed that the middle finger WC uses comes from stock just as his other "originals" do.
http://depositphotos.com/40151223/stock-illustration-illustration-of-middle-finger.html
http://depositphotos.com/40151223/stock-illustration-illustration-of-middle-finger.html
More Semantics, He said long before he started the piece that it was a stock image as this little project was not worth more time that a stock image on mahogany.
Glad to see we can repeat ourselves time and again with the same old semantics you were using a week ago.
Since were playing the semantics game, lets play my favorite game "here is the facts as written in the encyclopedia"
As Derivative works done in his own style his pieces are LEGALLY considered original. Dont take my word for it, ITS RIGHT HERE. So calling them original works is 100% the truth and fact. Thats not semantics, that's universally the truth
Was pointing this out to your potential buyers so that there wasn't any confusion (this seemed to be a problem with one of your previous customers). I wasn't talking about legalities.
This thread has been pretty hilarious on a slow Sunday evening though. 