@ Tecshare,
We were talking about who has the burden of
proof, not whether the evidence presented
was absolute proof or speculative.
Switching the point of argument is a weak
tactic that will not work on me.
You keep saying you want proof, and not
theories and speculation. Where is the
proof that WC has any hand carving skill whatsoever,
let alone being a 'master carver' ?
In my view the BURDEN OF PROOF lies on WC as he made the claims first that his pieces were all "HAND CARVED".
Asking him to prove that isn't much to ask if he is legitimate.
But so far we have no proof of his claims being valid. Only more doubt from his video he posted and his immature way of responding to critics.
I would disagree with this. He should be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Absent any proof/evidence that he is in fact being dishonest he should not be under any obligation to prove anything.
If everyone needed to prove they were telling the truth about their product to a trustworthy person then it would be impossible for anyone to ever become trustworthy in the first place