What evidence EXACTLY was quite convincing? Because I don't see any evidence, just a bunch of people speculating about what COULD have happened and ignoring perfectly logical explanations with contrary evidence. The fact that he didn't make a video that satisfied the peanut gallery is just evidence of poor video making skills, not evidence of his guilt. This again is just another suspicion.
I dunno, maybe that he hasn't provided
anything that can show he can carve? Sanding with a dremmel doesn't prove anything other than he hasn't adequately demonstrated what he's claiming he can do which is pretty good evidence in itself. The video he posted was like asking someone who is claiming be a master painter to prove they can paint replicas of the Mona Lisa and as proof they show you a video of them crudely drawing a stick figure with a marker pen (one where the outline is just being traced as well). WC could have closed this case very quickly if he wanted to but surprise surprise he just has a whole lot of excuses and tried his best to try weasel out of it hoping people would buy his bullshit with the weak evidence he presented and guess what? It didn't work.
How long has it been since this whole shitfest started, what like 8 days? So he produced a video that did not meet the stringent and constantly shifting standards of the mob right away rushing to try to get something out. It is a fair amount of work to stop his lifes normal activities, set up a proper camera setup, carve the piece from start to finish, then a very long time to upload the high resolution video. Meanwhile the whole time everyone is already making their conclusions even before the first video was posted. That is not "weasling", that is just everyone jumping to even more conclusions. More video is on the way. I suggest people suspend their judgement until then.