What I meant was that they have already proven that creating pools for this coin is extremely risky and not worth the effort so I don't understand why people are getting their panties in a bunch? There are literally 1000's of coins which are instamined or RAPED hard by farms in pools or ICO'ed and then the devs just up and leave with the BTC and all you people have time to complain about is this? It has been said time and time again if you don't like a coin or what a coin is doing or saying or claiming then NO ONE is forcing you to invest in that coin or be a part of that coin right?  I mean honestly the saddest thing about all of this is the absolute best thing anyone can come out with is that after 6 months someone experimented and tried to set up a pool for this coin and claimed that it was to test to see if it could be done and admitted to Mr. Spread making this coin virtually pool less because of the simple fact that the risk of running or mining Spreadcoin in a pool is too great!! I don't get what people don't understand about that?  What if Bitcoin wasn't pool mineable? Would we all be bitching at the people who mined it in the very beginning so they were able to make a mint off of it and build their rigs bigger so they could still be the only people mining Bitcoin? NO people who mined Bitcoin were ecstatic when pools came out because even someone like me could get some BTC without needing a huge mining rig.  Anyways that was kind of off topic there lol What I'm saying is I don't see what the point everyone is trying to make here? Just face the facts that Mr. Spread is a very good developer and that his coin from what I've seen has pretty much been flawless in every aspect!! How many coins can do that? How many coins have had bugs and problems  over their lifespan? In my opinion SpreadCoin has been one of the only coins I've noticed that when something is released for it..... It WORKS!