Hey tvbcof, we're going back up. Time for you to flip your tune and say you been calling it all along.
My being so right and you being so wrong with your one-trick-pony show is really getting under your skin I guess. Sorry about that. My good calls are mostly luck I assure you.
I am quite confident that if you get your way on Bitcoin it will be curtains for the solution. You may realize that and simply plan to do your dump at that point, but I actually believe there is a better than 50% chance that you earnestly believe your own nonsense. I'm burnt out on being more rude then that at the moment else I would use a variety of caustic characterizations to describe your being here.
There is a irreconcilable difference between you two. cypherdoc wants to profit from Bitcoin's wide adoption while tvbcof wants to profit from daytrading. cypherdoc believes in the long term sociological impact the Bitcoin experiment will have while tvbcof believes Bitcoin is doomed to the whims of the controlling powers and no more than a pyramid that will eventually collapse.
As long as neither resort to social engineering, it's all good.
I understand the upload vs download bandwidth argument. It's not a problem because it will deter no fee transactions. Nobody wants to spend bitcoins that will never get confirm.
Except double spenders, but there are better ways to catch them.I understand the attractiveness of parallel processing Bitcoin transactions through side chains, but they don't solve the bandwidth problem unless you use only one side chain exclusively. That issue has not been addressed.