The onus is not on the community to prove that you are running a scam.  You're right, they can't.  You can always claim that the images you use are just stand-ins and that you can't release any actual photographs yet because the hardware is being finalized and so forth and so on.

The onus is, however, on you to prove that you are legitimate.  There's plenty of ways in which you can do so, and you have not chosen a single one of them so far.  Furthermore, you're only strengthening the case that you're not on the up-and-up by virtue of the tone of your post alone, attacking the community.  I'm working on the ASIC page of the wiki and I can tell you right now that you have every sign of a scam that is very poorly done; ASX Project, Cryonics, German Bitcoin Mining, Global Mining Hardware Solutions, RCM Miners, and others.  All with either no information, ridiculously implausible information they couldn't back up, bad photoshops / renders, or overall "prove we're running a scam" attitudes.  If you want to see somewhat well-run scams, check out labcoin or VMC.

Innovation coming along and people saying "it's a scam!" is right - but guess what happened to those that really innovated, such as Avalon, ASICMiner, ButterFly Labs (shipping and legal issues aside), KnCMiner, BitMine (and believe me, they had their share of accusations), etc.?  They provided proof.  They showed actual hardware, they shipped it to trusted members of the community for verification/review, and even if later claims seem implausible, everybody listens.
I'm not saying you have to send out free miners - I don't even agree with that practice - but at this time you're not providing any proof that you are even remotely legitimate, and the accusations stand on firmer ground than you do.