I am not the only one totally annoyed by how bitcoin behaves in an effort to keep the dominant position and be the 'one coin for all' and with this hurts the alt-industry. I think at this point it becomes inevitable to start using more than one chain and stop looking at btc as the only coin worth bothering with.
I see, so rather than doubling the size of the bitcoin chain you'd rather have two chains half the size? How is that a win?
It IS in fact a win - coins are easy to convert in many different ways within splitseconds. How is it a loose? From an economic standpoint it's not a loose. Say the coffeeshop accepts 'Bitcoin' but i do use xyz-coin. The conversion is a mere formal act. I can pay the coffeeshop in xyz-coin and the shopowner gets the coin he wants (gavincoin or whatever). Crypto is easy enough to convert for this to have no economic impact. All it takes is an exchange-app, and i think it could already be developed or even exist already (would need to check)
With multiple smaller chains the enduser doesn't loose souvereignity to too high hardware requirements.
You could in fact even merge mine them.
The individual user would not be required to store Terrabytes of data and have extreme bandwidth like he would be with Gavincoin.
How is requiring everyone to potentially store terrabytes a win?
---
This scenario is what will happen most likely anyway once running Gavincoin becomes unaffordable for the enduser.