I read about it only today. How do you think, is he guilty?
Yes, he is. Maybe not of every single charge but it's pretty obvious he's the guy who was responsible for setting it up and running it.
And what makes it so obvious to you that he ran the site the whole time and didn't just set it up, leave and get roped back in as a fall guy like Ross and his laywer claimed?
Where you on the jury or did you sit in the courtroom during the whole case?
Often when the US government wants to nail someone they will have so much FUD spread on forums and on the net just to help themselfs get the conviction.
I admit his defence sounded a bit strange, but truth can be stranger than fiction a lot of the time.
I would have prefered the outcome to go Ross's way and see MK in prision dropping the soap, lol.