Still, approach aside, he was more right than wrong.
No. He wasn't.
You and he both continue to deliberately misinterpret a few guys mining to the same wallet daemon as a "pool". I have 3 cpu's, and a couple gpu's pointed at a common wallet as well. By your "new" definition of "pool" I suppose I am a "pool" too? Right? What a crock! I never thought so before, but...
Woohoo! I'm a "pool" now! Ummm, so how do I start collecting them "pool" fees? lol!
The proper definition and clear understanding of a "pool" by the VAST majority of this community is an open public "pool" such as GHash.io, Suprnova.cc, Yaamp, Coinking.io, TradeMyBit, etc. Before Spreadcoin came along and your ridiculous FUD campaigns, there was never any question about that.
It is abundantly clear that there are NO Spreadcoin "pools" like those mentioned above at this time, even with a 3500 SPR bounty to whoever can create one and and operate it successfully for 30 days. Therefore, by standard definition, your error is abundantly clear.
But as long as you people keep willfully and disingenuously trying to misrepresent a few guys sharing the minprivkey of a "communal wallet" as if they are anything remotely like one of the "standard" pools like I mentioned above, your argument simply has no foundation and can't be taken seriously...