If you support the use of force against individuals that make use of your ideas against your will, you ultimately support killing them.
Do you think an individual has the right to defend himself against aggression?
Do you think you have the right to fine me for infringing on your copyright?
Do you think you have the right to send armed men to my house if I don't pay your fine?
Do you think those men have the right to kill me if I defend myself against them?
Can you answer my question regarding a world where physical goods are as easy to copy as intellectual goods? Does it make sense that the above escalation of force is justified if I copy your lawnmower?
No.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
No.
Since we don't live in la-la land the question is quite pointless. There is a difference between physical and intellectual property. And there's no labour involved in the lawnmover example. If you did copy my "lawnmover" while the rest of you used a scythe to cut your grass, then yes, I would mind. The above escalation, no, I don't condone killings.
And why did you ignore my questions?