So even though I'm the only one with access to the content, it's not scarce?
No, as has been explained to you many times, for something to be scarce it has to be the case that only one person can possibly control its usage at a time. Are you saying that it's the case that only a single person at a time can
possibly use the information contained on a set of blueprints? I hope not because that's obviously not true.
According to Libertarianism, no. According to the current laws, yes. The law used to be that you could own black people. I guess you would have supported that back then too, huh?
Dear lord. First I'm anti life. Now I'm also pro-slavery.
Let's be civil please. Don't do that.
So you admit then that just because a law is on the books doesn't make it justified? Good, now we are back to square one, providing a justification of intellectual property laws.