Bitcoin always has and always will mean different things to different people. I'm not joking when I say that I believe the hard-fork is a deliberate attack on the part of some people and a stepping-stone toward destroying Bitcoin by destroying fungibility (chiefly through {color}-listing.)
As you seem to be the only person in the thread who sees a connection between a higher block size and blacklisting coins, perhaps you could walk us down the logic path you took to reach that conclusion? Sounds like an attempt at scaremongering to me. Either that, or the anti-fork crowd are running out of legitimate arguments and are getting desperate.