What about some decent reasoning?
"Roadstress says retarded shit, therefore Roadstress is an idiot".
Sounds like a decent syllogism to me.
English is not my main language if that's your problem with me.
Still not a single reason (besides bloatchain) of why we shouldn't fork. Just like everyone else that it's anti-fork. Simply saying "no no no" without bringing anything new to the discussion isn't constructive at all. Ok. Since you are out of arguments and you refuse to answer to the question of why shouldn't we increase the block size limit should we revert to calling names each other?
See, I'm visualizing sidechains as a (frankly, near perfect) solution to give the masses (and their network effect) all of the power of Bitcoin and much more while not damaging it with pointless bloat which reduces the pool of potential infrastructure support.
I am a big fan of the sidechains too, but do we know how much space in a block will the 2-way peg need? I don't remember seeing a reference to this.