Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: GAW Miners Paybase Paycoin unofficial uncensored discussion.ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)
by
bananafana
on 08/02/2015, 04:03:03 UTC
Mr. Garza, in (250) words or less, please explain how you plain on defending your admitted involvement in what can be easily classified as a classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme in addition to other ongoing conduct relating to the mishandling of verifiable securities in violation of sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a), and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c), 77q(a) & 77q(b)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]?

"Mishandling of verifiable securities"? Who wrote this?

And who thinks that paycoin/paybase looks like a "classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme"?


I agree, more like straight up theft, rather than pump and dump scam.
He lied that there was no pre-mine. Then, sold off millions of premined coins for a ton of money.
(He claims it wasn't pre-mined and that he was just lucky enough to find the first block that just happened to contain millions and millions and millions of coins.)

Where did he claim that? I've seen him rationalize the size of the premine, but not claim that they were "lucky" to get the first block, which would be one of the stupider things he ever said.

How did he rationalize the theft?

By "theft" you mean "premine"? He talked about needing more coins for investors because the ICO was in such heavy demand or something along those lines. I'm not saying that was true, just that it was the explanation the HT faithful were given for the size of the premine.

I found an article here were he seems to be waffling over whether or not to premine, arguing that it ultimately doesn't make any difference as far as their customers are concerned: 
https://hashtalk.org/topic/17638/decision-to-mine
You can see where the plan was evolving there, even if his reasoning is entirely bogus.