I don't want Bitcoin to lose market share to altcoins. You do:
There are at least three other blockchains available which are well suited to handle the small (Cryptonite), medium (Litecoin), and private (Monero) transactions.
I want the distribution of wealth in crypto to look like the pie chart of mining pool hashrates.
Given you don't share the interests of the majority of the Bitcoin community, in seeing Bitcoin remain the dominant cryptocurrency, people should be wary of your opinion that the 1 MB restriction should be made permanent.
And as I mentioned, your rationale for opposing lifting the 1 MB block size limit, goes against everything Bitcoin has stood for from the beginning.
You claim what you're hoping for is that Bitcoin becomes "super gold" transfer system, that only large financial institutions can afford to directly access. What the Bitcoin white paper promised is:
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfAbstract. A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online
payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a
financial institution.
An ultra expensive "super gold" transfer system that only large financial institutions can afford to directly access on behalf of their end users is exactly the opposite of a peer-to-peer electronic cash.