Icebreaker now claims that he doesn't want a permanent 1 MB block size limit, even though he made a post titled:
"Permanently changing the 1MB transaction supply is a great idea ..."
as a play on the title of DeathAndTaxes' post, which simply argument that the 1 MB block size shouldn't be made permanent. His post ridiculed DeathAndTaxes' position, and strongly implied that he favored a permanent 1 MB restriction.
And he refuses to address how far his vision of a super expensive "super gold" transfer system, that only large financial institutions can afford to use, strays from the original Bitcoin white paper of a "purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution."
"Permanently changing the 1MB transaction supply is a great idea ..."
as a play on the title of DeathAndTaxes' post, which simply argument that the 1 MB block size shouldn't be made permanent. His post ridiculed DeathAndTaxes' position, and strongly implied that he favored a permanent 1 MB restriction.
And he refuses to address how far his vision of a super expensive "super gold" transfer system, that only large financial institutions can afford to use, strays from the original Bitcoin white paper of a "purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution."
On the Hardware section we call him Icetard or many different names. He is a clown that imagines about himself as an advocate of crypto. It appears that the poll that he just created is against him already which is quite funny
And the thread that he just created speaks about says a lot about him and about the majority of the anti-fork team.