I want the distribution of wealth in crypto to look like the pie chart of mining pool hashrates.
Bitcoin should be the largest, followed by many smaller ones, not a top-heavy 85%.
If 1MB starts creating problems, let the market and ecosystem deal with them for a while and see what they come up with.
Then, armed with empirical data, we can decide with higher consensus whether to change it, and by how much.
Bitcoin should be the largest, followed by many smaller ones, not a top-heavy 85%.
If 1MB starts creating problems, let the market and ecosystem deal with them for a while and see what they come up with.
Then, armed with empirical data, we can decide with higher consensus whether to change it, and by how much.
Again someone that is against raising the block size limit who wants to impose his views. So you want a distribution on wealth like a pie chart, but you also want the market and the ecosystem to deal with the problems. It can't be both ways. It's either your way or the market's way.
I am an advocate of crypto in general, including Bitcoin and altcoins.
LIES! The only thing that you advocate for is failed business like HashFast. Most of your post are praising and defending a failed (scammer in my view) company that managed to eat ~50M$ while leaving most of its customers with nothing.
I know that you will say otherwise, but please prove it that you are an advocate of crypto in general. Otherwise you just eat shit just like Mircea Popescu and his sock puppets accounts.
As they mature, free markets favor and tend towards the dynamic stability provided by Nash Equilibrium. And so do I. Mining pool self-regulation is a great, topical example.
I don't need to prove my crypto bone fides to some jerk who has only been here 7 hours longer than me. My posting history, signature, and personal text (under the avatar) speak for themselves.
HashFast made ASICs to mine (IE process and secure) Bitcoins, not altcoins. Could you possibly be more of a ridiculous assclown?
