Re: [ANN] MangoCoinz Official ANN Thread - Mine cryptocurrencies on you smart phone
In regards to the recent hack this is what I remember seeing posted from the DEV
Hey everybody,
We've just published MangoCoinz v0.5.2 and it will be available to update in a few hours.
This is a security update, and updating from v0.5.1 will not result in coin loss.
A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system.
Best regards, Srele from MangoCoinz.
Notice that he says "A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system."
Meaning that when I explained about how you could earn heaps of MangoCoinz on the older app versions and then when choosing to you can update to the latest version and sync it up with no limit or a very high sync limit for 1 day since those coins were earn't on different kinds of settings.
I was told this is not possible by the DEV yet he has said in the latest release "A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system"
I think we have a bit of a hiccup here.
Hey everybody,
We've just published MangoCoinz v0.5.2 and it will be available to update in a few hours.
This is a security update, and updating from v0.5.1 will not result in coin loss.
A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system.
Best regards, Srele from MangoCoinz.
Notice that he says "A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system."
Meaning that when I explained about how you could earn heaps of MangoCoinz on the older app versions and then when choosing to you can update to the latest version and sync it up with no limit or a very high sync limit for 1 day since those coins were earn't on different kinds of settings.
I was told this is not possible by the DEV yet he has said in the latest release "A short time after the update is available, it will be the only version able to interact with the system"
I think we have a bit of a hiccup here.
this must have been from the api's used prior to the 0.5.2 because i can vouch that the apiv2 did not accept requests with a lower version than 0.5.2, a majority of the fixes in that release were bugs and issues i reported to the developers privately, i havent bothered to look at any of this in about 2 weeks but with the permission of the devs ill gladly take a look again if they would like
Hey blackwat3r,
feel free to take as many looks as you like
We appreciate if you inform us of what you find.you cant just throw out a tos after your service has been initiated because none of your existing users were given terms of service to abide by when first registering for your service, this is considered very bad practice and any rules put up after this point are not valid to users because they were allowed to register for your services and use them from the start without being given rules to follow, especially since this is a service from which monetary value is involved
as per the no coins from your fee account...
thats just the fee account
what about for example, the 8000 coins you sent to a user named micto, where did those come from, because theres no plausible way with the date on that transaction that you were able to mine/sync 8000 coins at that point in time, this is just one example
That account has never even received 8000 coins in total during it's existence. We just checked at. And what is mine username, since you are so eager to point fingers.
srele, and Srele with a capitol s, atleast according to the transaction logs provided by another user, and from monitoring your blockchain
transaction specifically shows Srele sending 8000 mcz to micto
as much as id like to think this is incorrect, this is coming from information that was pulled directly from your blockchain in the beginning, and directly from the transaction logs from the aforementioned account so i doubt its incorrect